All posts by keith

Quest for Truth 139 Humanity, from Innocence to Immorality

In a solo episode with Keith, hangout for a session in getting down to a few basic concepts about humanity, and the initial blessings laid at our feet. If it’s all so great, then why is the world we live in so messed up? Keith also talks about what sin is at its core, and what was lost, corrupted, and what we have left.

One basic principle is that God is entirely good, loving, and sinless. Only angels, and mankind can sin. Amazingly, commentaries can be vague on the topic of sin. To figure it out, a look at the first recorded history of where it came from, and what the world was like before and after it entered offers some clues.

ADAM

Humanity

The first man. Creation of

Genesis 1:26-28

26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

Observations:
People are physical beings, but our spirituality is in the image of God. What do we find him doing in these early pages? Creating, building a special habitat, uniquely designed for humans. He laid it at our feet to rule over, discover, and enjoy. We have his blessing, and in the physical form of male and female, we can create human life. Try as we might to create life, or animate life in some artificial way, it can’t be done. It is so obvious and simple to do when a male and female join together. Creating life is the highest form that we humans can create on our own. It should be a humbling thing that deserves our highest respect and responsibility.

Genesis 2:7;

7 then the LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.

1 Corinthians 15:45;

45 Thus it is written, The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit.

Observations:
Skipping ahead to Paul’s writing, he makes the connection between the first, physical, man who brought life, but also sin and death, to the second Adam. The one who would bring spiritual life. But let’s return to thug of humanities intocense.

History of, before he sinned

Genesis 1:26-30

26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food.

30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so.

Observations:
Mankind was made to rule over all life in the earth, and even the world itself. To subdue it, discover all its mysteries. All this in a state not of perfection, but of innocence. He was blessed, and his place was established to learn about this amazing place, while using all it contains responsibly, and in a manner in line with how God would be glorified the best.

But wait… there’s more…

Genesis 2:16-25

16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden,

17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

18 Then the LORD God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”

19 Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.

20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him.

21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh.

22 And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.

23 Then the man said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

25 And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.

Observations:
Mankind was given food, but with a boundary. All the other plants in the garden were fine, just don’t bother this one in particular. That’s it. Just think of how long the man and woman might have continued living in innocence, but the warning was they would surely die. Not an instant death, but one that began its process in that instant.

The man was given work to do in this innocent time. Tend and till the garden, discover, explore, name animals, all this to occupy his time, and do one more thing. God let the man come to realize that as fascinating as this created universe was, all that knowledge, and pursuit of it was unfulfilling. The man still needed a counterpart. Someone to be a suitable fit, to keep from being lonely. Someone equipped in a different, complimentary way to create life on their own.

The female was created out of man, presented to him, and approved of by him. The marriage relationship was established as good, in this age of innocence.

All these things were put in place and blessed, while humanity was in its undefiled stage. They are created good. And they still are intended as blessings for us. To rule, to work, to eat, to marry, and to otherwise discover our world, they have also become objects of corruption and abuse.

Temptation and sin of man

Genesis 3:1 ;

1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?”

Observations:
Without going into the whole ordeal of the initial sin, the lie was introduced. Twisting God’s word, putting words in his mouth that were never said, and the hook is set. The far reaching affects of this tiny act of rebellion were incomprehensible by the first humans at this time.

Isaiah 43:27;

27 Your first father sinned, and your mediators transgressed against me.

Observations:
Everybody sins. parents pass sin on from generation to generation. Just as leaven works its way through the whole loaf, and is passed from one loaf to the next, sin is passed in the same kind of way. Even someone held as a mediator, a go to person, a coach, or whatever, they have their limitations due to their own sin.

Subsequent history of

Genesis 3:20-24

20 The man called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living.

21 And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them.

22 Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—”

23 therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken.

24 He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.

Observations:
What just happened here? Was the sin in eating a piece of fruit? Maybe, not exactly. Was it in rebelling in Crossing a boundary? Yes. What was lost, or gained? A clear understanding of what morality was grasped, but that eye opening experience came only after the deed was done, and there was no going back on the choice. Knowing right and wrong was already in place, and the warning God gave earlier should have been enough. A choice, the wrong choice is all it took to plant that first seed of sin.

Sin is our intentional choice to act, and make the wrong choice, even when we know it’s wrong. Especially when we know its wrong.

Sin condemns, and requires punishment. God’s presence was removed, the tree of life is removed, the humans are kicked out of the garden. All the other blessings remain, but only with a degree of added work, pains, and other problems.

Genesis 4:1,2,25;

1 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.”

2 And again, she bore his brother Abel. Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, and Cain a worker of the ground.

25 And Adam knew his wife again, and she bore a son and called his name Seth, for she said, “God has appointed for me another offspring instead of Abel, for Cain killed him.”

Observations:
Sin is passed to the next generation. In the verses in the middle of chapter 4, God warns Cain over being upset over his offering. Despite the choice to drop the anger, and live well, Cain makes the intentional choice to be angry, and hate. The attitudes lead to being deceitful, and then to kill. One attitude feeding the next, and ending in the act of murder. God gives a mixture of punishment and protection.

His death

Genesis 5:5

5 Thus all the days that Adam lived were 930 years, and he died.

Observations:
And so it goes. The act of sin continues. It can only end in death. Our sin is the thing that condemned us and keeps us from ever being in God’s presence. Regardless of the deed, it boils down to having a choice, knowing between Right and wrong, and choosing wrong. Knowing what good and evil is, and choosing evil. Sin was passed down to us, and we pass it down to the next generations.

Fortunately, we have a way to break the cycle, and end the problem of sin, We can be justified, and returned to God’s good graces. Jesus paid the price to cover sin. It’s God’s gracious gift we don’t deserve. By confessing sin in our life, repenting from it, and turning to him in the faith we receive from the Holy Spirit, we are assured of his eternal spiritual kingdom. A choice to sin got us into this mess. All the horrible things in the world come from decisions that people make. Through a choice in faith, we can claim the promise of being included in a spiritual kingdom of life.

Quest for Truth 138 Parenting Style with John Wilkerson

To start things off, enjoy a short drama as the Retrobots help get the studio ready for the roundtable. Guests don’t show up, messages from a fan mean a secret is revealed about Retrobot David. It’s time to get started, so we get right to it.

John Wilkerson of the Wired Homeschool is on hand to discuss some ideas related to parenting style.

Main Topic

Parenting Styles

There are four styles, based on 2 points.

Authoritarian.

Characterized by being: High on control, low on warmth.

  • High expectations,
  • structured environment, and clearly stated rules.
  • Unquestioned obedience.
  • Little negotiation between parent and child.
  • Children may benefit from boundaries, but it lacks a loving environment.
  • Demands are not balanced by responsiveness.

Permissive.

Characterized by: Low on Control. High on Responsiveness.

  • Avoids confrontation. ,
  • Low on setting limits, or asserting authority.
  • Children regulate their own behavior.
  • Accepting, affirmative, and tolerant of children’s impulses.
  • Desire for child’s self expression, not conforming to society expectations.
  • See themselves more as a friend than parent.

Uninvolved.

Characterized by: Low on control. Low on Responsiveness.

  • Worst case, they are neglectful.
  • More commonly, they provide for basic need, but focus is on self interest. Career, drugs, etc.
  • Few expectations.
  • Unlikely to be involved in child life, events, etc.
  • Little or no supervision.
  • Unable, or unwilling to provide support, or don’t recognize they’re not.
  • Find it easier to take a hands off approach.

Authoritative.

Characterized by: High on Control. High on Responsiveness.

    Sets clear standards,

  • accept responsibility to be responsive to child need.
  • Willing to discuss options, and negotiate rules or standards.
  • Nurturing or supportive, rather than imposing punishment.
  • Assertive, but not intrusive or restrictive.
  • Want children to be come assertive, self disciplined, responsible.
  • They listen to children.
  • Encourage independence.
  • Place limits, consequences on child behavior.
  • Express warmth and nuture.
  • Allow children self expression.
  • Encourage child to discuss options.
  • Fair and consistent discipline.

Authoritative is found to be associated with positive outcomes In social, psychological, and school success.

It focuses on child’s best interest, even if it means sacrificing self interest.

It insists on the child taking some responsibility, with responsibility increasing as they grow.

Quest for Truth 137 The End. What’s Next?

Our special roundtable presentation has to be called off, almost as quickly as the dramatized way you hear it happen in the interchange between Keith and the Retrobots. The cancellations actually started the day before, but the last ones were called in within the final couple hours before we hit the record button.

Since the topic we planned on was geared to our panel of guests, we fall back on a last moment topic. Escatology is a huge area of study, and our time is limited. Still, we give it as much as we can, before Nathan has to run.

Main Topic

So, what exactly is Escatology. No, it’s not the study of really curvy cats. Although that would make a lot of sense. It is actually the study of last things. Or the study of end times.

Most of the time attention is given to what happens at the end of the world, raptured saints, the return of Jesus, and all like that there. We aren’t going there today. That is known as a global end time.

There’S another kind of end time. A personal end of time. Here’s a spoiler alert for you, we all die. Sooner or later, we will all come to a day where our bodies stop, and our time on earth is no more. When that happens, and we’ve reached our personal end… what comes next?

The biblical worldview has a few things to say on death and resurrected bodies. We have enough time to examine five of these points. Hebrews 9:27 states that we die, then are judged.

And just as it is appointed for man to die once,
and after that comes judgment,
Hebrews 9:27 (ESV)

People die once. No second times through on this merry go round. God only allows us one shot at this physical life. There’s a lot to explore, do, and enjoy, but when it’s over, all that remains is judgement on how well we spent our time here. There’s judgement, no grace or mercy. We have that now. God grants all kinds of grace in this life, but only judgement remains when we account for what we did here.

1. The body returns to dust, the spirit to God.

Ecclesiastes 12:7 (ESV)
and the dust returns to the earth as it was,
and the spirit returns to God who gave it.

When the body dies, the part that is spirit, or our soul, is torn away as the bond that holds it together is broken. The body begins it’s journey back to dust, and to the earth swhere it came. The spirit returns to God.

Wait. Does this mean that all people go to heaven? It says the soul returns to God, right? Yes… then the judgement. If all souls return to God, it is at this point they will be judged, and there are only two options. Two destinations, and one is already set, unless a choice of faith is made during your life.

2. Spiritually: born dead.

Ephesians 2:1-6 (ESV)

1 And you were dead in the trespasses and sins
2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience�
3 among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.

4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us,
5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ– by grace you have been saved–
6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,

This claim is that it’s our physical nature to be self serving to our passions and desires. We are easy prey to sin and rebellion. Simply put, verse 1 states, you were dead in trespass and sin. It’s only by God’s love, grace and mercy that he even offers to take us out of it. We have abundant grace and mercy now. All we can count on when our soul returns to God is judgement.

What happens to the soul, after this encounter with God? What are these two destinations, and who goes there?

3. Second Death: Is for the unrepentant.

Revelation 21:8 (ESV)
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable,
as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars,
their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”

The short list of sins listed are only representative of who will be separated from God. A key trait in this list is the word faithless. Many sins aren’t on this list, but those people will find themselves here all the same. God knows the heart, the inner self, he knows who can stand before him, and still, from the core of their being, count themselves in rebellion, and faithless. There is a place where they will be. It’s a place where God is not, and they will have received their wish to spend their eternity without him.

Just as the body dies, decays, and returns to dust, the soul goes into a perpetual state of death. Are you living? Are you aware? Does it really never end? I don’t know, but I don’t want to be there.

4. Second Death: None for the repentant.

Revelation 20:6 (ESV)
Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! Over such the second death has no power,
but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for a thousand years.

There is some poetic language in play here. The first resurrection refers to Christ being the first fruit, the man by whom sin was concquered. As such there’s never any chance you’ll be going to the place where the soul is perpetually destroyed. Reigning for a thousand years doesn’t mean a literal thousand years. It means for a long period of time.

The simple answer here is that when God finds us worthy to be in his kingdom, we are blessed, and there’s only one destination for us. If one place is a death of the soul, the second death, the other place is life to the soul, forever.

What determines we’ll be in this blessed place of life?

Our time is nearly up, but we have time to bring up the matter of where sin and death comes from, and where we can find resurrection and life.

5. Through One man, sin. Through one man, life.

Adam: Through him, sin, with both physical and spiritual death came.

Jesus: Through him, resurrection, with spiritual life came.

1 Corinthians 15:21 (ESV)
For as by a man came death,
by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.

Because of Adam’s poor choice, we are alldeestined to make the same poor choices. We’re born into it. His poor choice doomed us all to a physical death, and we’re born into a spiritual death. When Christ came to the world, he proved he was worthy by living up to God’s standard. Living all the laws in his book with perfection. He died to justify us, and pay for our debt of sin, and just as he conquered death and was resurrected, we also have that hope. Whether our bodies die or not, we are blessed that we can claim spiritual life when we repent, and receive faith from the Holy Spirit to believe that he truly justified us. We fully claim God’s grace and mercy, and there’s no fear in judgement when we stand before him.

After Nathan has to leave the call, we have a final song, thanks to Kathy Adkins for permission to use her music.

To put a final closure to the day, the Retrobots close us out with a thought for the week.

Quest for Truth 136 Merciful Forgiveness

In a shorter, solo episode, we Keith falls back on a topic gleaned from a recent Sunday school quarterly. If you get material from the Gospel Project, it may seem familiar. All we do is take the bible passage, outline, and read a couple opening statements, and talking points. Basically a derivative work to present a basic theme of forgiveness, and how it works in the context it was intended.

To help with the scripture reading, a guest Retrobot is on hand. Be sure to drop us a line to let us know how he did.

Let’s get right to the main topic, and a parable about…

The Unmerciful Servant

Theme: Those who receive forgiveness must, in turn, extend forgiveness.

  • Our debt before God was too great to be paid through our good works or effort,
  • We have received forgiveness through the grace of Jesus Christ, who paid our debt through His death on the cross.
  • God has wiped the slate clean with the blood of His Son.

Introduction

Revenge in our culture shows up in books, movies, and in a fictional world seems to bring a satisfying sense of justice. The good guy wins, and the evil deeds of the bad guy catch up to him. A reason to celebrate… right?

Revenge in the real world, as testified to by a search through news headlines reveal it’s emptiness. For example, a father who got revenge for the death of his son only led to another death, and such grief the father hung himself because he couldn’t cope with his loss.

Another tragic tale of revenge found a doctor, stripped of his title and profession after 4 counts of revenge. Now he’s facing a possible death penalty by the justice system . Revenge has never been intended to fall to the hands of men. Even just retribution is designed to come at the hand of civic authority, not an individual.

1. How much forgiveness is required of a Christian?
(Matthew 18:21-22 CSB)

21 Then Peter approached him and asked,
‘Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? As many as seven times?’
22 ‘I tell you, not as many as seven,’ Jesus replied,
‘but seventy times seven.

How would you define forgiveness? Is it just allowing someone to continue taking advantage of you, resetting the count up to 490 to 1 at each occurance? Forgiveness Is more than a one way street. You are not outside your right, or expectation to say, “I forgive, but please stop.” Even Jesus exercised this when he forgave the woman caught in adultery. “I forgive you, go and sin no more.” To forgive, but not expect a reciprocal response, is to condone the injustice.

Still, forgiveness needs to be extended as often as God does… overtime.

For Peter, the culture of his day, and even in our own, we use the principle of “3 strikes and you’re out”. Peter probably felt he was being generous in doubling that number, and adding to it. Jesus played his little legalistic game, took that generosity, and multiplied it exponentially.

What would such a level of grace and forgiveness within the church communicate to unbelievers? You’d think it ought to open up a batch of warm, fuzziness, and people might flock to our church to be saved. Maybe so. In a more practical way, they might think we’re all a bunch of push overs. Morons who just let the world come in and take what they please, or abuse us as much as they like, and the kind, and forgiving Christians will let them.

I don’t think that’s what God wants. It’s possible to forgive, but not trust someone. We don’t have to set ourselves up to be taken advantage of on repeat cycles. A broken trust is one that is hard to rebuild.

Can you forgive someone without loving them? Emphatically, no. The natural reaction is to lash out. Love paves the way to forgive. It cannot exist without love.

2. As Christians, we have received forgiveness
(Matthew 18:23-27 CSB).

23 ‘For this reason, the kingdom of heaven can be compared to a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. 24 When he began to settle accounts, one who owed ten thousand talents was brought before him. 25 Since he did not have the money to pay it back, his master commanded that he, his wife, his children, and everything he had be sold to pay the debt.
26 ‘At this, the servant fell facedown before him and said,
“Be patient with me, and I will pay you everything.”
27 Then the master of that servant had compassion, released him, and forgave him the loan.

In this example of how God’s kingdom works, the amount owed represents an amount that no one can hope to repay. From a couple different sources, the tallest was equivalent to about 6000 days of work, or a full 20 year career for the common laborer. Now multiply that by ten thousand. Even for a wealthy man, a term of multiple lifetimes is out of range of being able to repay it.

If you’ve had a huge financial loan forgiven in your life, there was probably cause to celebrate. Imagine the kind of celebration that will be taking place in God’s kingdom for the forgiveness of our debt of sins.

3. As Christians, we must extend forgiveness
(Matthew 18:28-35 CSB).

28 ‘That servant went out and found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii. He grabbed him, started choking him, and said,
“Pay what you owe!”
29 ‘At this, his fellow servant fell down and began begging him,
“Be patient with me, and I will pay you back.”
30 But he wasn’t willing. Instead, he went and threw him into prison until he could pay what was owed. 31 When the other servants saw what had taken place, they were deeply distressed and went and reported to their master everything that had happened. 32 Then, after he had summoned him, his master said to him,
“You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you begged me. 33 Shouldn’t you also have had mercy on your fellow servant, as I had mercy on you?”
34 And because he was angry, his master handed him over to the jailers to be tortured until he could pay everything that was owed. 35 So also my heavenly Father will do to you unless every one of you forgives his brother or sister from your heart.”

The injustice here is clear. A similar kind of debt was owed, but the forgiveness wasn’t passed along. I have a problem about using this as a teaching to warn Christians they need to forgive… or else. That implies that salvation can be lost by failing to follow biblical teaching and examples. True, Christians above anyone else ought to pay God’s kindness and forgiveness ahead to those who wrong us.

What about when we do our best, but keep tripping over our own two big feet? We intend to do right, we mean well, but the weakness of our human desires gets in the way?

The core thing to look at is the heart, as mentioned in the final phrase in the passage. Clearly the first man didn’t have a forgiving heart. To me that is better represented by the people in the world, who enjoy all of God’s graces by living in his good and abundant creation. They rack up debts against his mercies and blessings. He loves all people, and offers the same forgiveness to all, even those who would throw it back in his face.

I propose to you, the hard hearted servant doesn’t represent the Christian believer, but those who abused God’s blessing, and refuse to extend his kindness. Their action demonstrates whose kingdom they belong to. M maybe they’ve never heard of the godpel message. Maybe they’ve rejected it. Maybe they’ve just been holding back, thinking God is an absent king, and he’ll show them forgiveness and mercy on that last judgement day.

If that’s so, then this parable illustrates their true heart and the wrath that will come their way in all fairness, and rightly so.

Does it represent the fakers? Those do a good job at pretending to be Christians? Again, their heart will be exposed, and that lifetime of self deception will be set right.

Is it possible to truly be a Christian, if we can’t find it in a softened heart to extend the love and forgiveness we received through Jesus to others? The answer should be no. However, it does take some intentional fighting against our human nature. We sometimes show resistance in small, subtle ways. The first step, recognize we do it. Try to be intentional in letting go of those inner thoughts and desires to get back at someone for an infraction against us.

Be challenged by Jesus use of the phrase
“from your heart” to His command to forgive?

Conclusion

To repeat the concepts we came in on…

  • Our debt before God was too great to be paid through our good works or effort,
  • We have received forgiveness through the grace of Jesus Christ, who paid our debt through His death on the cross.
  • God has wiped the slate clean with the blood of His Son.

To wrap up with closing thoughts, our Retrobots David and Callie add to Keith’s thought for the week.

Quest for Truth 135 Peace, Joy, and Hope

In something of a solo episode, Keith reviews a message of hope for those who have found the true way into God’s grace. Nathan can’t be live in the studio, but he has a few thougts on the topic recorded for us. Keith shuffles them in as we turn to the upbeat words found in Romans 5:1-11.

But first, in a short segment on meeting the hosts, Keith reminds folks to watch for the guest appearance Nathan made on the Old Time Superman podcast. By the time this show is posted, their 1000th episode should be available. Also to get ready for the launch of our very own original audio drama, Dangerous Christian. Production is well underway, and our first episode will be here before you know it. Tell your friends, and be sure to support the project on Nathan’s Patreon page, leave a rating and review, and encourage us to keep the shows coming.

Main Topic

In presenting the message in Romans 5:1-11, Keith shares some key words, and uses Matthew henry’s commentary to add some good news that has stood the test of time. Nathan reads the scripture, and interweaves his own ideas on the meaning of such foundational concepts as being justified, having faith, and the hope of God’s eternal grace to those who believe.

To be clear, we have peace once we are justified, a price that can only be paid by Jesus. Believing that fact, we are given the faith of the HolySpirit, who fills us. Actually if we bring anything to the table, it’s not belief, it’s a burden of guilt, sin, and shame.

This faith gives an admission ticket to God’s grace. A grace wherre he’s pleased with us. No wrath. His judgement is only for those who refuse to recognize sin in their lives, those who see no shame in it, or for whatever reason they see no burden of guilt with sin. Having access to God’s grace is always a reason to rejoice and celebrate.

When sin is removed, covered, paid in full by the sacrifice Jesus made for us on the cross, we have hope. An expectation where we can be confident in eternal matters.

There’s a proof for our faith. Suffering, or troubles, or the pressures in life. As the pressure is turned up, we see the depth of hardship our God can deliver us out of. The deeper the trial, the more our faith is strengthened, the more we experience firsthand how secure this expectant, confident hope reaches. God sees no shame or disgrace in enduring this kind of hoe, or the tests we go through to get it. There’s no shame in God’s love, or in the Holy Spirit who fills us.

The ultimate image of love is portrayed in how Christ died for us. Not after we did something, or cleaned up our act. He loved us enough to die, when all we could do was bring him our sin, and immorality.

Nathan wraps up by reading a parallel passage, 1 Corinthians 15:12-20. Sin isn’t just some kind of filth, or dirt that can be washed offf. Jesus refers to it as leaven. Think of how leaven works by permiating to every part of a lump of dough. Only sin is a leaven that pollutes. Nothing tastey, or good about it. Not something that is washed from the surface, but is shot through our character.

That’s the power that the justification from jesus has. Hope. Admission to grace. Time to rejoice.

In closing, our Retrobots share a thought of the week.

Quest for Truth 134 Superman, Zombies, and the Secular Age

Getting right to the topics at hand we go right into our usual segments.

Meet the Hosts.

Life in Church House Studios has been pretty routine, except our new addition, a year old kitten, has proven himself to be an alarm cat. Nathan revisits the audio drama projects he’s been doing. Script writing, and posting a few new shows on his other podcast feeds.

For Superman fans, be sure to check out a guest appearance on the Old Time Superman show for their 1000th episode. He’ll be joining the host, Adam Graham, and others to talk about the 1940’s radio show. We spend a little time with our own ideas about the iconic super hero before we move things along.

Main Topic.

Are you ready for zombies? So were we. The trouble is that other than our title, we spend very little time discussing them. The misleading title was what lured Keith into reading a book. It turns out to have little to do about the walking dead, but it addresses why people today love apocalyptic things. It also uses popular movies and TV shows with apocalyptic things to illustrate how our society of the Secular Age got to where we are today.

Four key steps describe, or they try to, how culture shifted away from God based morality, to human based morality. First some background, and comparison.

Religion vs Secular Humanism

Before the Modern Secular Age.

Humanity is porous. Individuals find their identity by participating in their group. Individuals are influenced by relating to, and with others. All this give and take, and mutual influence requires a framework of morality outside the self. Religion or government. To be inside this framework, the claim is the individual is limited in self expression. To be outside the framework of this morality is to be cast off as either a beast, or a barbarian. God is seen as creator, the giver of an initial grace that’s instilled in us at birth, and an ongoing grace that keeps us in the system, and offers explanation to the mysteries of the universe.

After the Modern Secular Age

Humanity is buffered. The individual has an imaginary, buffer, or a coating, or a protective bubble where they are immune to the influences of others. The individual doesn’t need outside influence, since science now offers rational, natural explanations to the mysteries of our universe. Individuals can flourish on their own, without the need to fit into a confining structured like religion. Sure, it’s still there, but is now compartmentalized, and it’s not the main framework of morality. As far as morality, there is no greater good outside the buffered individual.

With just this background, there are so many things wrong with this new, buffered, identity. It assumes that the structure of religion is man made, and that human interaction and relationships are entirely detrimental. . The claim is that’s better to use science, an outside factor, to allow the buffered person to make their own moral choices. It’s all about the uninfluenced choices.

Science may do a fine job in explaining our observable world, but the one thing it can never do is make a moral judgement. If moral choices are left to the Individual, there’s no way to determine moral choices with science alone. With all choices having equal weight in importance, then none of them can be determined to be more moral than another. People need interaction with an outside standard to let them know if they’re achieving anything. Therefore the buffered existence is an illusion that can only hope to work, when adequate outside standards, or morality, is imposed. This view point fails by making too many false assumptions, and claims to truth that have no foundation or evidence. It relies on outside influences for information, and any real moral standard is meaningful only with an outside standard. In fact, all this ideology proves to be the opposite in the real world. Solitary isolation is the worst thing that can happen. It’s a punishment, not a means to flourish.

The anthropocentric Shift… Huh?

That’s just a big word that means a “Humanity Centered” shift.

The 4 steps.

1. It’s Not about transcendence,

I know, more big words. Transcendence. Being beyond the limits of our experience. Beyond comprehension. Having universal application, or significance.

In brief, if we can’t experience it directly, it doesn’t exist, or it doesn’t apply. God, being a transcendent being, means that our only duty to God is that we achieve our own good, and help one another. This step also means there’s no universal or absolute truth.

Nathan has lots of challenges to this claim, since too much of it relies on the untrustworthy claim made about the porous person vs the buffered person. People need other people. Any real moral standard has to come from outside the buffer zone of any individual, if only to agree with other individuals on the outside moral standard. That’s how families, tribes, nations, and governments figure out what laws to make.

It’s great to seek self improvement, and to play well with others.
But you excel at this when you’re the porous human, not the buffered human. People need contact with other people. A buffered life is an illusion that can only exist in the reality of complex support systems, provided in the reality of porous humanity.

2. As buffered selves we no longer need ongoing grace.

The distinction between initial and ongoing grace needs to be clarified. Ongoing grace relates to the need for religious order, a matter which the people of the Secular Age claim they don’t need. Why? Because science tells us how things in nature work. The problem of sin, morality, and the need for salvation is left for the buffered person to give value to, throwing God’s grace back at him.

What’s the initial grace? The inborn logic, intellect, and rational thought we have to comprehend the world. This kind of grace is enough to achieve human good. It’s all we need for any form of self discipline. God may exist, and have created order, but he left the universe to let it wind down, and for people to discover its marvels. Besides, if someone is unfaithful, then god stands at the end of history to judge, or accept them with joy.

Again, there are so many unproven statements in this step. Not to mention the contradiction of the self reliant nature of a buffered person, yet readily accepting the outside influence of science. Possibly because it’s a safe intrusion that merely observes facts, and leaves moral interpretation to the whim of the individual. But if the buffered person allows for the existence of God, and his role to fairly judge, wouldn’t it be important to know what his standard is that he’ll be using on that day at the end of history? Hint: it’s not based on “good enough”, it’s based on “perfection.”

People in the Secular Age seem to reject traditions, and long defined terminology. However, the “initial grace” is explained eerily similar to the religious concept of being made in “God’s image.” We have a body, soul, and mind, because that’s God’s image he puts on us. We have the logical rational thoughts to discover and enjoy his universe. The buffered person may admit God exists, created, and set systems in place, but the difference is that person thinks God made it and left it. The religious person claims God is still actively part of it. Hey, he sure seemed to be in it pretty actively, until the last century or so. Is it really God who left, or the thoughts of humans who left him?

One troubling point is the resignation that if God exists, he’ll clear it all up at the end of history. Wow, that’s a big gamble. The judge already knows your deeds. All arguments, appeals, or hope of mercy is off. Your deeds are what they are. There’s no changing them. Would you go into a court of law in this world, with all your charges before the judge, and be totally unprepared? How would a judge react to a plea of, “I didn’t know. I didn’t think that was a law. I didn’t mean it. Nobody told me…” or any such excuses.. How much more so, the judge of the universe? It’ll be a day of just decisions, no mercy, and fair treatment. Are your deeds good enough? Will that punishment really be fair? Will it really be forever? Now is the time to find out. Hint: They are far from it. It will be fair. Forever is a huge gamble, but evidence in biblical worldview is that it will be for eternity.

We start to run low on time, but we press forward to squeeze in the final two points.

3. The Sense of mystery fades when the world is disenchanted.

What? Mystery? Disenchantment? For a science based, logical proposition, this almost sounds supernatural. What it means is that without science, there’s a lot in nature that seems mysterious, and unexplainable. Strange or powerful forces in nature had been attributed to various gods, or considered miraculous. The buffered, secular person claims that all unexpected things in nature can be explained. Certainly we still love to explore the world, and there’s much left to explore and discover. God does not routinely reach down and do miracles. If he did, we’d think it was irrational and irresponsible of him.

The universe is certainly a place of wonder. At least the Secular Age people admit that. Science has indeed explained many things, and will find even more interesting things. Still, there is no morality in all this knowledge. What about explaining miracles with science? We give some examples with the Israelites being set free from Egypt. Some claim earthquakes made a land bridge to appear, then disappear at the convenient time to let a few million people cross, but not the pursuing army. Plagues like turning water to blood is supposed to be from mud slides of red clay, giving a blood like appearance. Explainable. But not in matters of the timing, or the placed, or the placement of the people who had the need, at that time, for that duration of time, when they were already walking in a path where the situation could easily have been avoided. For all the convenient earthquakes, mud slides, or explainable events, the timing is too convenient for such natural explanations to hold up when you consider all that took place at the deliverance of the Israelites. The events in the Bible narrative are plentiful, and to have convenient earthquakes, or natural events happening exactly when a people in need have them happen is just too much to not consider a supernatural element.

4. The purposes of Faith based activity has changed.

It was once taken for granted as a centerpiece of faith, that god planned on transforming human beings beyond the limitations of the human condition. . Now we see the practices of religion, prayer, devotion, etc, as a means to bring about human flourishing. To have a “Theistic rationality”.

What does that mean? Humans used to think religious activity changed us, and made us into better people. ]That doing religious stuff is what transformed us, and how we got to heaven.

Now people consider it just helps to think rationally about God. It’s nice to help us be good humans, but that’s all. It’s OK to think about God as creator, but all that supernatural, afterlife stuff is no longer thought real. Even if there is an after life, we’d be a lot like we are now, but without some of the more painful and awkwardness.

Nathan can agree, we’d be less awkward, and painful than we are, but the rest is a lot of assumptions. It still doesn’t explain what level of morality will ensure people end up in eternal bliss, and who will be sent away in judgement. It’s also more a matter of people changing their minds about God, not him revoking any of his eternal purposes.

What is God’s purpose for man? The age old doctrine is that man’s purpose is to glorify God, and enjoy him forever. There’s no mumbo jumbo about self fulfillment, or choosing to make him optional, or invent an imaginary concept that you hold as truth.

By now, our time has been up, and we don’t have Time to give better attention to this last step. It relies on too many assumptions, not facts. Too many assumptions in the earlier, basic steps are not even circular, they’re statements with no proof or evidence They make a claim of ffantasy, but have no proof, and their only supports are imaginary. The idea of a solitary, buffered person goes against the basic nature of reproducing life. The worst punishment that can be given a person in jail is to be in solitary confinement. To be the ideal buffered person then, is to impose self inflicted solitary confinement.

How can this ideology be good? It relies heavily on the porous kind of humanity for life support, and knowledge gathering from outside the buffered self, then withdraws into a fantasy world, outside of reality to play a dangerous game of, “what if.”
. It leads to serious problems, mental and moral instability, and an illusion of freedom.

We close with a thought of the week. As always, if you feel we need to cover this topic better, or a point in it that we glossed over, or forgot, let us know. We always want to be fair in representing ideas that are not our own. If there’s a topic you want us to discuss, whether it’s a troublesome bible passage, or a world view, or world event, let us know. We love hearing from you.

Quest for Truth 133 Bible Survey 15: Miracles and Signs of Jesus

Some last moment slip ups find us on a different topic than planned. Not that anybody would notice, other than I just said so. We fall back on our ongoing Bible Survey. The actual next installment was #14, The Word Became Flesh. However, we already covered this in 97 An Unrecognized Christmas Gift, a solo episode where Nathan shared a sermon.

Before we move on to installment 15, we start with our usual segment…

Meet the Hosts

There’s not much new happening around Church House studios. Chris is in the building, but doesn’t join us due to getting ready for a followup doctor appointment. Just routine stuff. Dealing with dead computers means shuffling how things get done behind the scene in our recording process. Nothing major, and again, something the listener might never know if it wasn’t shared. It just means extra editing to get the show ready.

Nathan has been busy with his various audio productions. Casting calls are getting results, and some work is being done in turning scripts into audio. Stand by for developments as we draw closer to a launch date for our project, Dangerous Christian. Support us by being part of the launch, telling people about it, sharing on social media, and supporting it through Nathan’s Patreon page.

Main Topic: Bible Survey 15 Miracles and Signs of Jesus.

The gospels are full of them, but as a sample, the survey lands on two important situations. A paralyzed man who was healed when his sins were forgiven, and a woman who was healed on the Sabbath. Why are those things significant? Let’s have a look.

Matthew 9:1-8 (ESV)

1 And getting into a boat he crossed over and came to his own city.
2 And behold, some people brought to him a paralytic, lying on a bed. And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Take heart, my son; your sins are forgiven.”
3 And behold, some of the scribes said to themselves, “This man is blaspheming.”
4 But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts?
5 For which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Rise and walk’?
6 But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins”—he then said to the paralytic—”Rise, pick up your bed and go home.”
7 And he rose and went home.
8 When the crowds saw it, they were afraid, and they glorified God, who had given such authority to men.

First, the paralyzed man was brought to Jesus, probably by some of his friends. Jesus saw their faith in him. He encouraged them. Sin was often attributed to disabilities in ancient times, and Jesus made the simple statement that his sins were forgiven.

Scribes who were present claimed that it was blasphemy to forgive sin. They were correct. Forgiving sin is something only God can do. For a mere man to make such a claim is indeed a blasphemy. God never interacts with humans, unless a prophet comes to pave the way, and signs are involved. The scribes are about to get their proof.

Whether the scribes actually muttered words out loud or not, Jesus knew what evil attitudes were in their hearts. He made it plain where the power of his claim came from. He didn’t just give lip service by making an empty claim. He asked them what kind of evidence it would take to prove his authority. Is it easier to
Talk the talk, or to have the man be healed on the spot?

Without waiting for an answer, Jesus told the man to get up, walk, and go home. The man did it.

Did the scribes believe? It doesn’t say, but they had the evidence they required to believe. What kind of evidence do you need? How much evidence will it take to meet your own requirements?

We take a short break, and share a glimpse of our upcoming audio drama, Dangerous Christian.

Next, we look at Luke 13:10-17 (ESV).

10 Now he was teaching in one of the synagogues on the Sabbath.
11 And behold, there was a woman who had had a disabling spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not fully straighten herself.
12 When Jesus saw her, he called her over and said to her, “Woman, you are freed from your disability.”
13 And he laid his hands on her, and immediately she was made straight, and she glorified God.
14 But the ruler of the synagogue, indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, said to the people, “There are six days in which work ought to be done. Come on those days and be healed, and not on the Sabbath day.”
15 Then the Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Does not each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or his donkey from the manger and lead it away to water it?
16 And ought not this woman, a daughter of Abraham whom Satan bound for eighteen years, be loosed from this bond on the Sabbath day?”
17 As he said these things, all his adversaries were put to shame, and all the people rejoiced at all the glorious things that were done by him.

The setting. Jesus was in the temple. A woman was in the temple. Neither were there especially to be healed, but Jesus saw her, and healed her.

  • He told her she was healed.
  • He layed hands on her, and her bent back straightened.
  • She praised and glorified God.

Simple, right? A beautiful act of releasing a woman from her long years of suffering.

What’s the problem then? The head religious leader got himself bent out of shape because the healing was seen as work. The Sabbath was to be a day where no work was to be done. The day had become more holy to him than the act of doing good. Through Jesus, god worked a blessing of relief to this woman.

Jesus is always the most critical to those who claim to be his people. The Sabbath is an important day, a sacred day, but one that God makes certain allowances for. If the priest had thought before he spoke, he would realize that the Sabbath was not a day of rest for those serving in the temple. Care for animals was a necessity, which Jesus pointed out.

If work, or perceived work is to be done, at least make it work that blesses. Animals are blessed when they get fed, or untied, or otherwise tended to. Why is it any less a blessing if a person is healed, and released from their burden?

Bottom line. As believers, we get bogged down in the exercise of practicing religion, we can miss what God intends for us. Our meetings, or programs, or systems take priority, and can’t be interrupted, even at the chance that God wants to extend a blessing from a direction we hadn’t been looking.

Whether being an unbeliever, as with the scribe, or a priest whose intent was to defend the faith, but nearly missed out, we know that Jesus has authority to perform such signs and miracles. He has the authority, because he is the physical presence of God to interact with humans. There are two proofs to know that Jesus is who he claimed to be, believe his teaching. If you can’t believe the words he said about himself, then believe the signs he did.

Whether you’re the skeptical, naturalistic person who doesn’t believe in miracles and anything resembling the supernatural, or you’re the kind who is willing to take the reports in the gospel at face value, there is plenty of evidence to believe. The real question then is, how much evidence do you need? Life is full of unanswered questions, and times where we need to fill in the blanks on our own to make a decision. We make decisions every day, based on fragments of information. If we do this for the mundane things in life, why not make a decision about eternal matters?

To wrap up, we share a few closing thoughts of the week.

Quest for Truth 132 Amoral Science and Organized Religion

Trying to squeeze in as much as possible, we get right to our segment… right after a small glitch from the Retrobots.

Meet the Hosts

Our long in coming audio drama is getting closer. The first scripts are done, and several parts assigned. The only drawback remaining is in waiting for our volunteer voice actors to return their parts, so everything can be compiled. Watch for more word, and a launch date. Be sure to tell your friends, and for contributors through Nathan’s Patreon page, we have plans for interviews, behind the scenes stuff, and chat room sessions with the cast.

We never ask for monetary support for this podcast, but the audio drama involves a lot more effort, and a recurring contribution through Patreon will encourage us to devote more attention to future projects like our unassuming, everyday kind of super hero.

Our main topic really isn’t all that long. It’s a role play type of episode, and it can be difficult to give a topic the depth it deserves, when the ideas expressed aren’t your own. Besides, Keith lost his notes to guide him along, and had to wing It from memory. To allow ourselves to go down a bunny trail, we include the problem of why science makes a faulty platform for discussing topics in a public forum.

The language of science has become the only accepted and recognized way to prove a point, or settle an argument in public settings, or even in discussing morality.

The good point in science is that it tells us what a thing is, how it works, and what affect it might have on its environment. But it has shortcomings. The problem with science is it can’t answer the question “why.” It can’t determine morality.

For example:

  • It can identify an object, like a hand gun by observing it.
  • It can point out how the parts work, where the bullets go, and the mechanism that ends with a firing pin striking the cartridge.
  • It can describe the chemical process that occurs, and how expanding gasses push the projectile out the end of the barrel.
  • It can also tell what might happen at the point of impact where the projectile lands.
  • An experiment might even be practiced to verify and demonstrate the hypothesis discussed to this point.

Science can not make a moral judgement of whether we should use a paper target, a tin can, a lab rat, or your neighbor’s head. Strictly speaking, science can only describe that a destructive event will happen. It can’t place any value on the object being tested in the experiment. It can’t say why it might be morally wrong to pull the trigger that sets off the process.

All science can do is state that pulling the trigger will end up in a destructive event. It’s left outside of science to determine whether the target has any value or not.

We point back to a solo episode done last March, 107 ASSURANCE OF SALVATION that includes an essay Keith wrote titled, The Purpose of Man without God. An attempt at exploring the shortcomings of worldly knowledge, pleasure, or power, and who gets to say where morality comes from.

Our role play runs short, as expected, and any misrepresenting was unintended. Please contact us if you feel we didn’t do well at it, or have a more rounded argument for us to address.

The statement of: Why I hate organized religion is brought up.

For starters, what does that mean anyway?

In Doing research, most results were from religious people giving apologetic reasons why its a bad statement. It doesn’t make any logical sense. Another result was from a foreign language forum, where people there tried to figure out this nonsense statement. They had no words for it in their own language. One blogger who had been against the so called organized religion, but came to grips with the fact that those in her activist groups weren’t making any sense. Was it being organized that her friends were against? Was it religion they were against? That blogger found merit in religion to support her cause. Even Wikipedia commented that the term is meaningless of itself. By definition, religion is organized. Exactly the same as government is organized, a business is organized, sports teams are organized, and so forth.

Finally I managed to find a discussion of people who held this ideology. And our role play begins.

The core issue is a little confusing. People hate organized religion. They love religion, but don’t want to be confined by any one religion. Huh?

People feel it’s OK to pick and choose, treating all the world religions as equal, and have no problem walking down the buffet table of ideas, taking a morsel of what looks good onto their plate, and leaving the rest. A little here, and a little there, mix and matching fragmented doctrines to build their own special plate full of… disorganized religion?

Another defining feature in this crowd is they are fine with religious matters, they just don’t want you to force your morality on them. Nathan points out that those people are often quick to force their own moral judgements on others who they perceive are in disagreement with them. At the best, even if they don’t, and they are passively left to set their own morality, eventually they run the risk of meeting up with someone who may have low morals, is bigger and stronger than them, and force them into a subservient lifestyle.

To wrap up, we share a closing thought where the Retrobots make an appearance.

Quest for Truth 131 A World of Materialism

In an earlier solo installment, the topic of worldview was the focus. There were five major ones that challenge a biblical worldview, and today we give a brief look at another. To see the others, with a summary of each, and the book that inspired the episodes, check out Secular: What in the World Is It?

Before we begin, our long lost co-host has returned.

Meet the Hosts

Nathan gets us caught up with a project that’s near and dear to our hearts. Our audio drama production of a modern day, low key kind of hero is underway. Casting calls are being responded to, and if you want to be part of it, it isn’t too late. Nathan is taking requests, but feel free to drop me a line, and I’ll forward your inquiry.

Summer camps have been a success, both for the one Nathan went to, and one we are involved with. Lots of kids and adults having fun in the Summer sun.

Time is of a premium so we turn to the main topic.

First, we touch on a hot button topic or two. Namely those regarding the recent racial tensions, and some challenges that face bringing a Christian message into the mix. I hope it doesn’t come across as being one sided, but this is a topic that was intended to cover several weeks ago, but we never quite got it to the table.

What does it mean when we use words like racist, or bigot? More often than not those labels get used without actually knowing. They get cheapened when they are tossed out for a simple matter of disagreement. Using those words without understanding their meaning, or the person or group that get tagged with them makes the labeler the racist or bigot, not the one being labeled.

In today’s climate, that may sound a bit petty. There’s along unhealed rift between blacks and whites. All lives really do matter. They are equally valuable and important, and to pick a side isn’t helping. Christ was neither white nor black as we might define those races. It was still his blood that was shed for people of all colors. If you don’t believe it, thinking religion has been polluted over the years… you may be right… or you may be wrong.

Now is a good time to touch base with the roots of Christianity. What did the first century writers have to say? You know… those men of color, who lived in the Middle East, and taught there, and in Northern Africa. What did they say, and which flavors of the Christian religion still closely hold those teachings? I’m not here to say. Some definitely do not. Some do. No single race holds the monopoly on Jesus. It pays to do your own investigating, paying attention to the evidence the earliest writers documented.

With our extended bunny trail as wrapped up as we can make it, our attentions turn to the promised topic.

Without using the name of this worldview, Keith tries to describe it. What does it stand for? Why might some people find it appealing? Where are it’s shortcomings? Nathan has it figured out, and we pull the mask off… the Marxism worldview.

To summarize:

  • It’s all about materialism and money. Social standing, and equality.
  • The ideal is to ensure equality for all regarding social standing, income, and power.
  • To close the gap between the very rich and the very poor. A classless society.

Does that sound appealing to anyone out there who may be feeling oppressed and under appreciated?

Wait, there’s more…

  • No individual should have the right to own a means to make money, and not share it with his workers.
  • No individual should be able to set an unrealistic price on goods, making them unaffordable by the workers.
    • Especially when it drives the owners income up, and further from that of the laborer.
    • Especially when the product is unaffordable to use by the worker who made it.
  • When the social economic environment is stabilized, all will live as one, in peace and harmony.

Still sound appealing?

We try to use real examples of how this ideology actually crushes the people it claims to help. It’s an ideology that still has to have a form of government to oversee it. When all the people are brought down to the lowly, equal state, it means the few, elite in government power, are unrealistically elevated above the common citizen. It means a free market and competition is gone. It means the public, actually government owns production, sets price, quality, availability, and choice. Without free market competition, there’s no motive or incentive to improve or develop new products.

The capitalistic democracy that we know and love here in America may get a lot of criticism, but by and large it has been more successful and shown more promise in creativity in realms of art, science, technology, and more, than the quality of life in those practicing Marxism. Sure, there are those who are extremely wealthy, but more often than not they do provide benefits for their employes. Wages are rarely set so the product isn’t affordable to the laborer. There often stock options, giving ownership, and a share in the profits to the worker, and other ways of giving back to the needs of society.

How might this worldview pollute the church, and biblical worldview?

Our time is rapidly running out, but when looking at what might be considered appealing, the motive centers firmly around materialism. In a word, greed.

This worldview also teaches that all means should be used, even violence and terror, to overthrow the oppressor, and share goods equally. Revolution is encouraged to squash the opposition, unless its Marxism itself. There can be no opposition in the ranks.

Definitely a far cry from the teaching of Jesus. Where’s peace, love, forgiveness, building one another up, helping the poor, the orphaned, and the widow? Harmony and peace is attainable in this world, through Jesus doctrine. It can never be through the teaching of Marx.

There’s more we didn’t get into, like the rejection of all religion, and forcing atheism on everyone. Also the idea that humanity, actually the common worker, is the authority to decide morality. All ideas that are at odds with Christianity.

To officially wrap it up, we share a thought for the week. And just in time too. The Retrobots… well actually our unruly one… was sent out on a mission, and has come sneaking back into the studio. A good time for Nathan to make a hasty departure.

Quest for Truth 130 Bible Survey 13: Promised Messiah

Or, They Went Out of Their Way

Before we get started, the Retrobots, at least one of them, goes a little berserk over a small disagreement Nathan had over our last episode. I invited him to expand on that matter, plus a few other items that came up in the two previous solo episodes. Thanks to our unruly Retrobot, those responses will have to wait until later.

Nathan did manage to get through, thanks to our sane Retrobot, Callie, and read the passage, and shared his thoughts on how the people in this account went out of their way, some involuntarily, and some intentionally.

Quoted from the Literary Study Bible:

This best known of all Bible passages–so carefully located in time and place (a style that literary critics call circumstantial)–draws a contrast between the humble circumstances of Christ’s birth and the glorious praise that he deservedly receives from multitudes of the heavenly host. Reinforcing the motif of humility, the style is simple and the effect one of understatement as the world-changing events are narrated in a matter-of-fact way. In this birth narrative Luke introduces two of the main themes of his Gospel: as the Son of David, Jesus has come to bring salvation to Israel, especially poor and lowly outcasts like the shepherds; as the Savior of the world, he has come to bring salvation to all people.

English Standard Version:

2 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. 2 This was the first registration when2 Quirinius was governor of Syria. 3And all went to be registered, each to his own town. 4And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, 5 to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. 6And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. 7And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn.

8And in the same region there were shepherds out in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. 9And an angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were filled with fear. 10And the angel said to them, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. 11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. 12And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger.’ 13And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying,

14 ‘ Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!’

15 When the angels went away from them into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, ‘Let us go over to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has made known to us.’ 16And they went with haste and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby lying in a manger. 17And when they saw it, they made known the saying that had been told them concerning this child. 18And all who heard it wondered at what the shepherds told them. 19 But Mary treasured up all these things, pondering them in her heart. 20And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all they had heard and seen, as it had been told them.

Afterward, Keith shares a few references from the Old Testament that prophesied the coming Messiah, the need for a savior, and the restoration to God, and out of sin, that moment would bring.

There’s also special fulfillment to promises made to the nation of Israel. Hope is extended to the gentile, or the non-believers, to now be included in future promises. Those believing gentiles, and Jews who recognize this promised event are now part of a special group known as the church.

Remember those promises from last episode that didn’t always sound so nice? Because of the work of the Messiah, and the Holy Spirit to save us through the price art the cross, and through faith, we can expect a place in a future kingdom that will unite the realms of both heaven and earth.

We close out with our closing thoughts, and even Nathan Caldwell manages to sneak one in.

PS: Stay tuned for the end credits to roll through, and a candid lesson in phone etiquette with our favorite unruly Retrobot. I’m not sure he quite gets it.